ISO 9001 Quality Management Principles

February 11th, 2010 by admin | 5 Comments | Filed in iso 9001

ISO 9001 Quality Management
Principles

During my early days of employment in the late 80’s, the company I worked with engaged a consultant to get the company certified in ISO 9002 QMS.

I was one of the working committee then. Training was provided, followed by documentation of all our processes. A simple guideline was given to us to “document what we do” and “do what we documented”. During that time, this guideline was quite straight forward. So we did and the company obtained its ISO 9002 certification.

In late 90’s there was a rush into converting our ISO 9002 QMS to meet the new ISO 9001:2000 revision. I was told that this new revision is more align to business needs as well as less emphasis on documentation. On the business needs aspect, there is the “Eight Quality Management Principles” in the new revision. They are as follows:-

1) Customer Focus

2) Leadership

3) Involvement of People

4) Process Approach

5) System approach to management

6) Continual improvement

7) Factual approach to decision making

8) Mutually beneficial supplier relationship

Here is the interesting part of this article. The author like to share with readers how some of the companies he worked with interpret these principles and applied them. By no means these companies are wrongly applied the Eight Quality Management Principles. As a matter of fact, these companies has their valid reasons for doing so. This articulation of the principles is written in 3 parts, namely; principles supposed to meant; how it is applied as a case; and author’s view to expand its application.

Principle 1) Customer Focus “Organizations depend on their customers and therefore should understand current and future customer needs, should meet customer requirements and strive to exceed customer expectations”.

Case 1) Many companies viewed customer needs are obtained from a survey. And as ISO auditor come around to conduct surveillance audit once or twice a year, they get the survey done right before the auditor come around.

Author’s view 1) Conducting a survey is a form of documentation. In fact, customer needs can be obtained in many forms (most company knows that). Other than a formal survey, customer needs obtained in other forms such as during customer visits, customers complaints, customer feedback etc. These data should be taken officially as an input into the ISO system.

Principle 2) Leadership “Leaders establish unity of purpose and direction of the organization. They should create and maintain the internal environment in which people can become fully involved in achieving the organization’s objectives”.

Case 2) Most leaders set direction in the Quality Policy and Quality Objectives. Management reviews were conducted to ensure its fulfillment. However, most leaders are not involved in creating an internal environment in achieving the organization’s objectives. Most often than not, they delicate to the Quality manager.

Author’s view 2) Delegating to the Quality manager seems to be the most logical role to a Quality Manager. However, in some smaller company, Quality manager does not have enough influencing power to his/her peers hence cannot command radical improvement to the Quality System.

Principle 3) Involvement of People : “People at all levels are the essence of an organization and their full involvement enables their abilities to be used for the organization’s benefit”.

Case 3) While most company involve their employee in the ISO compliance effort, some involves them in other aspect of the business especially in production and process improvements as well.

Author’s view 3) This is the principle which is well implemented by most companies I came across. While it is perfect to involve employee in ISO compliance aspect. Some involve too much with the employee in selecting improvement projects. It is only logical that employee select projects that they are familiar and easy to do. But this selection often miss the key alignment to the company critical issues.

Principle 4) Process Approach “A desired result is achieved more efficiently when activities and related resources are managed as a process”.

Case 4) All if not most ISO certified companies are very good in production processes. Their ISO documentation for these process are well kept. However, their process approach seem to limit within the production and related supporting departments.

Author’s view 4) In the aspect of business process such as decision making, there is lack usage of a process approach in decision making. Often than not, quick decision are expected hence attention is not given to go through a logical steps.

Principle 5) System Approach to Management “Identifying, understanding and managing interrelated processes as a system contributes to the organization’s effectiveness and efficiency in achieving its objectives”.

Case 5) This area seem to show a loose link between production and the rest of the departments especially the supporting group. In some case, Key Performance Indicators (KPI) are established for each department but they are not interdependent.

Principle 6) Continual Improvement “Continual improvement of the
organization’s overall performance should be a permanent objective of the
organization”.

Case 6) In general, most companies work on continuous improvement as oppose to continual Improvement. some of the companies take “fire-fighting” as a way to continual improvement. VEry few realize the objective of this principle.

Author’s view 6) it is my opinion companies need to understand that source of information to trigger a continual improvement effort. And to establish it in order to clearly identify whether it is a “fire Fighting” or continual improvement.

Principle 7) Factual approach to decision making “Effective decisions are based on the analysis of data and information”.

Case 7) This is probably the weakness principle in terms of its application. To a large extent, Management make decision based on past experience, statement past around and so on. Often minimum data are sought after when a decision is made. Perhaps it is due to time factor. However, this phenomenon is so in the Quality Department.

Author’s View 7) This is an important principle management staffs need to develop. Past right decision made may not be repeated due to changes in the business environment.

Principle 8) Mutually beneficial supplier relationship “An organization and its suppliers are interdependent and a mutually beneficial relationship enhances the ability of both to create value”

Case 8) Most smaller company practice to some extent this principle quite well. perhaps it is due to smaller outfit that cannot command better service from the supplier, person in charge seems to have close relationship with supplier. On the other hand, bigger companies are bound by internal policies that requires 2-3 quotes from different supplier for the same items. Relation ship with supplier does not help to some extent.

Author’s View 8) This principle is difficult to master due to the fact that integrity is involved. Unless the company has big volume of purchase and strong vendor development program, it is understandable company pay less attention to this principle.

In summary

While ISO certified companies tried to comply to ISO requirements, they should extent the objectives of these Eight Quality Management Principles to enhance their business such that it become part of their business system.

As a side note, these quality management principles has many similarity
to the TQM principles. So, it is of the interest of leaders in ISO
certified companies understand it and put an effort to extent the
objective of ISO certification beyond certification purpose.


About the author

 Dr. L M  Foong-PhD, is a TQM practitioner. He publishes TQM Articles,
ebbok, case studies, trainer manual, facilitator guides and presentation
slides at TQM Case Studies website. He can be contact at

http://tqmcasestudies.com/ContactUs.html

 
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , ,

Quality Management Systems for the Food Industry: A Guide to ISO 9001/2 (Kindle Edition)

February 4th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Quality Management System

Quality Management Systems for the Food Industry: A Guide to ISO 9001/2

The ISO 9001/2 series of standards for Quality Management Systems is of increasing importance to the food and drink industry; it functions as an outward and visible sign to customers that the industry has a defined quality management system that has been independently appraised and is regularly audited. ISO 9001/2 certification can enable a company, to reduce the audit burden from a multitude of customers and can also help the manufacturer or distributor involved i (more…)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Integrated Enterprise Excellence System: An Enhanced, Unified Approach to Balanced Scorecards, Strategic Planning, and Business Improvement (Paperback)

February 1st, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Quality Management System

The Integrated Enterprise Excellence System: An Enhanced, Unified Approach to Balanced Scorecards, Strategic Planning, and Business Improvement

Review

“IEE is the most complete and effective operational management system available.” — Keith Moe, Group Vice President, 3M (retired)”IEE represents the best of best practices in measurement and improvement. It transcends Lean Six Sigma and the Balanced Scorecard. It’s a powerful business system that blends analytics with innovation and arms everyone in the organization with the tools needed to contribute to success. Aptly named, it truly integrates enterprise excellence.” — (more…)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook – updated for the ISO 9001:2008 standard, Sixth Edition: Using the standards as a framework for business improvement (Paperback)

January 29th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Quality Management System

ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook - updated for the ISO 9001:2008 standard, Sixth Edition: Using the standards as a framework for business improvement

Review

Published reviews of previous editions:”The definitive text on how to implement a quality management system ‘the right way’. Written in plain English. A great read.”Momentum Magazine, 2002″With its emphasis throughout on process improvement, the book is a must for anyone in the business of implementing or interpreting ISO 9001:2000 and, more importantly, looking to gain added value and enhanced organisational performance from it.” Quality World, 2002

Book (more…)

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

How to Implement “Lean” in Construction

January 28th, 2010 by admin | No Comments | Filed in Quality in Action

Lean construction is about thinking lean in order to accomplish more with less and in less time, but more importantly, getting the job done in ways that provide greater value to the client by delivering exactly what the client wants. Lean construction starts with value as defined by the client, but goes further by eliminating waste in the construction process.

Clemson Professor Roger Liska’s study on construction productivity estimated construction productivity at 40 percent. It’s not surprising that the construction industry’s productivity isn’t what it should be, but it’s time for the construction industry to make changes. When any industry, not just construction, has implemented lean thinking, productivity has been seen to double virtually over night

Increased Value

A contactor increases the value offered by first defining the project from the client’s perspective. This requires a change in the contractor’s attitude. Usually contractors believe they are responsible for responding to the client’s stated demands as described in the plans and specs or in the technical discussions with the client on a design-build project. This passive approach leaves much of the client’s requirements undefined because it only focuses on the bricks and mortar aspects of the project.

There is very little difference in technical performance among high performing contractors. For example, if the plans call for 3,000-pound concrete, all the contractors will provide 3,000-pound concrete. Poor quality contractors aren’t a threat to quality performing contractors. The bigger problems are when contractors worry only about following the plans and specs—only following the direction and nothing more.

If contractors want to act like the experts, they need to take a more proactive approach. I define a client as: “Someone under the protection of.” This definition requires a paradigm shift. Think about it. How long would you keep your attorney, your CPA or your financial planner if you didn’t think they were protecting you? So why should construction clients keep their contractors if those contractors aren’t protecting them?

This means contractors must act as advisors. But too many attorneys advise their clients not to do that because they might be held responsible. That position is ridiculous because the contractor is paid for his/her expertise. Then again, maybe that’s why profit margins have declined because contractors are only following directions and providing a commodity. If you disagree, consider your response to your doctor, if he said, “I agree, you’re sick. So what do you want me to do?” Sounds silly doesn’t it? But, it’s just as silly when contractors refuse to use their expertise.

Instead, contractors need to increase the services and relationships they have with their clients. I’m not referring to a relationship built by taking a client to a ball game or on hunting trips, but a relationship based on intimate involvement in a client’s situation. High performing contractors do a great job on construction; they help their clients find the best solutions for their situation. In other words, the contractor helps the client operate this business more efficiently. This is important because the amount of value a contractor can deliver on the physical building is limited, but the amount of value the contractor can provide a client on his/her ongoing operations is virtually limitless.

If the contractor speaks the client’s language and understands the client’s problems, then he/she can provide real solutions for the client. The value of these solutions will make the contractor’s performance priceless

Eliminating Waste

To deliver the best value, contractors must eliminate waste in the construction process. Contractors must understand how an event occurs to eliminate waste. An event is something that occurs over time.

Every event has initial conditions and if the initial conditions are known, then the final outcome can be predicted. Most people accept that idea. However, when people don’t know all the initial conditions, which is the usual situation, problems occur. There is only one outcome based on the initial conditions, but when the initial conditions are not known, it causes difficulty predicting the outcome. For example, if you never heard of gravity and stepped off the edge of a building, do think there is any doubt about the result?

Every event has initial conditions and if the initial conditions are known, then the final outcome can be predicted. Most people accept that idea. However, when people don’t know all the initial conditions, which is the usual situation, problems occur. There is only one outcome based on the initial conditions, but when the initial conditions are not known, it causes difficulty predicting the outcome. For example, if you never heard of gravity and stepped off the edge of a building, do think there is any doubt about the result?

Therefore, the first step in eliminating waste is to understand the initial conditions. While usually no one can identify all the initial conditions, experience allows qualified contractors to determine the most important conditions. If the final outcome isn’t what you desire, then you need to change the initial conditions. This is called pre-planning.

In the rush to get projects started, too many contractors skip over pre-construction planning because they believe they can manage the process once they get started. This logic is flawed because once you start the ball rolling in the wrong direction it’s very difficult, if not impossible, to change its direction. For example, what happens if the general contractor doesn’t take time to insure each subcontractor understands its responsibilities on the project? This creates the possibility that one of the subcontractors isn’t capable of performing as required and you can’t make a subcontractor perform if he/she isn’t capable. This leaves the general contractor with several poor choices. He can take over the sub’s responsibilities, replace the sub or settle for poor performance. None of these solutions is ideal. Instead, by performing a limited amount of due diligence before beginning the project, all resulting problems can be avoided.

This preliminary due diligence should include some past performance review, a risk analysis prepared by the sub to demonstrate his/her understanding of the project and interviews with the key project personnel to insure they understand their role and responsibility in the project. These steps are not complicated and don’t require a lot of time, but the effort is well worth it to eliminate problems.

Once a problem has been identified, the DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) model illustrated in Figure 2 can help identify and resolve the problem in a structured manner. The process starts by defining the problem or item that needs to be changed.

DMAIC model

Once a potential problem has been identified and defined, it can then be measured, analyzed, improved and controlled to obtain the desired results. For example, if there is some question about the potential performance of a subcontractor, you can start a measurement process by reviewing past performance, requiring a risk analysis of the project and interviewing the project staff. If this subcontractor measures up, then the project moves forward, but if the measurements indicate the subcontractor doesn’t meet the required skill and knowledge, the general contractor can take appropriate action.

The analysis would consist of reviewing the various options and determining the best course of action. The analysis would consist of reviewing the various options and determining the best course of action. In essence, implementing this new course is the improvement step. Once the improvement is in place, the control step is used to insure the solution is in fact following the prescribed new course. In other words, if we keep the subcontractor or select another subcontractor, we need to insure through controls that they are performing as agreed by all parties.

Solutions are often based on a trial and error process which is why the DMAIC Model is presented as a cycle. What if, despite careful analysis, apparent sound improvements and controls put into play, the desired results are still not being achieved? Then, the problem must be redefined and the process should start over.

The construction process is somewhat a trial and error process, just like any innovative process; therefore, the industry needs a structured process to more effectively deal with the unique challenges that face every project.

Lean construction provides an organized and structured format to help contractors perform more efficiently and effectively. While no process is the end-all solution, lean thinking is a powerful tool that all contractors should use.

Ted Garrison is the author of Strategic Planning for Contractors. Ted is the host of New Construction Strategies Internet Radio Program. He can be reached at 800.861.0874. For further information, visit www.tedgarrison.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • LinkedIn
  • MisterWong
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz